
The first three postulates in Book I of Euclids Elements describe which constructions were allowed in his development of geometry;
For Euclid and the other mathematicians of his time, the construction of the lines in Postulates 1 and 2 were carried out with an unmarked straightedge, while the circle in Postulate 3 was described with a compass. They restricted the use of these tools to the following specific tasks:
A geometric figure F is constructible from a given geometric figure G, if all of the components of F can be obtained from those in G in a finite sequence of constructions of the sort described in 1) and 2) above. We say that the figure F results from the figure G by a geometric construction and the finite sequence of constructions is called a construction algorithm for G given F.
This meaning for the term geometric construction is still current today! Although we now have computer software such as Geometers Sketchpad that can replace the compass and straightedge for actually carrying out geometric constructions, such software is designed to produce constructions that are exactly the same as those that can be achieved with a straightedge and compass. Such computer programs also have capabilities to:
Nevertheless, the geometric constructions that can be produced by these high-tech wonders are, by design, essentially the same in mathematical content as those achievable with a simple compass and straightedge.
Trying to learn geometry without using geometric construction is like trying to learn chemistry or biology without using laboratories. Basic knowledge and skills on geometric constructions help students to discover and explore geometric relationships and interpret geometric concepts and theorems. They can also help the teachers to transform the static and confusing array of definitions and theorems typically found in geometry textbooks into an active and exploratory investigation of geometric relationships. Computer-based geometric construction programs such as Geometers Sketchpad enable both students and teachers to explore geometric relationships dynamically and to create very complex and yet very precise geometric constructions and diagrams.
As any mathematics teacher knows, and as most students soon come to realize,
geometric figures are nearly always helpful for the analysis and solution of
real world problems and for learning new mathematical ideas. Although the geometric
constructions as we have defined them are not, strictly speaking, necessary
for such graphical descriptions of problems or ideas, their precision can often
reveal aspects of the problem or idea that may not be evident in an informal
paper or blackboard sketch. Teachers usually find that extra time spent in producing
excellent graphical reprentations and figures for class handouts and exams is
rewarded by better student understanding and interpretation of problems and
ideas.
|
|